In Criminal Law, what is required to prove a case?

In criminal law, the standard required to prove a case against the defendant is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This represents the highest level of proof required in the legal system. It indicates that the evidence presented must be so strong that there is no reasonable doubt in the mind of a juror regarding the defendant's guilt. This high standard reflects the serious consequences that a conviction carries, including imprisonment or even more severe penalties, thus emphasizing the principle of protecting the rights of the accused.

Conversely, the other standards of proof have different applications in various legal contexts. For instance, "preponderance of evidence" is commonly used in civil cases, where the burden is met if the evidence shows that something is more likely true than not. "Clear and convincing evidence" is a middle ground standard used in certain civil cases, requiring a higher degree of certainty than preponderance of evidence but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. "A majority of proof" is not a standard recognized in either criminal or civil law, thus lacks relevance in this context.