What must be ensured for evidence to be admissible according to the Best Evidence Rule?

The Best Evidence Rule mandates that for evidence to be admissible in legal proceedings, it must meet several crucial criteria: it must be authentic, relevant, and convincing.

Authenticity refers to the need for evidence to be shown as genuine or original. This ensures that the evidence presented truly reflects what it claims to represent, maintaining integrity within the legal process. Relevance means that the evidence must directly relate to the case at hand, contributing meaningful information that aids in resolving the legal issues. Lastly, the evidence must be convincing, indicating that it must have an adequate level of credibility and persuasive value to be accepted by the court.

Together, these criteria help establish a foundation for fairness and reliability in legal proceedings, ensuring that only credible and pertinent evidence influences the court's decision-making. This comprehensive approach is critical in maintaining the integrity of judicial processes, as it upholds the standards for what can be used to support or invalidate claims in court.